BGL dictionaries reported to have 0 entries

[user256]

When I scanned my bgl folder, GoldenDict detected all the dictionaries, but for the majority of them, it reported 0 entries.
I uploaded an example file:
http://www.mediafire.com/?23gy531uxxj

Otherwise thanks for this great application, the fact that it is built on Qt make it even better.
I think now I dont have a reason to not move to Linux.

[ikm]

Your example dictionary works just fine. Maybe you've misinterpreted something?

[user256]

I just tested again with only 1 folder containing the file.

Again, it shows up with 0 words and article.
Here is a screen


I'm using Windows 7 and Goldendict 0.9.0

[ikm]

This does look strange indeed. Ensure you have enough disk space for indices, try deleting indices. Make sure the file is actually readable by the program. In short, I have no idea how to reproduce this.

[user256]

This is strange. I tried all of the above, but same results.

I tested in a Windows XP machine, and I had the same problem again.

I even tested the maemo build of godlendict 0.9 BUT it works correctly (at least it detected correctly the ebook and indexed it)

I already use Qt and QtCreator in Windows, so I can help you debug this problem, but right now, I have no idea where to start looking.

[user256]

Any news about this bug ?
Are you considering a fix ?
So far, this bug is 100% reproduced on windows machines.

[ikm]

If it is 100% reproducible, how come no one else is having this problem?

[user256]

probably because there are not so much files that trigger this behaviour.

Again, the problem is not in the files (they load correctly on Ubuntu and Maemo4.1), but always show 0 entries in Windows. (Even with a fresh installed windows)

I can provide 3 mores files that can reproduce the bug.
Please anyone with a windows machine can confirm it with the first file ?
Thanks

[user256]

I downloaded the last windows build from here:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=77&start=100

All files are correctly detected now

[ebrahim]

I've got the same problem with latest GoldenDict (goldendict=0.9.1~git20100413-1 package of Debian sid) with following file: http://www.babylon.com/free-dictionarie ... 64762.html

Interesting point is that even dictconv has the same problem with this file. I looked around it and found out this BGL has got some blocks of type 11 and 6 which are not handled at all in dictconv. Although I haven't looked at GoldenDict code, I thought maybe that point is a good clue to start with.

Thanks for the great software